Personally, I continually update the work based upon review feedback until I get reviews that I'm satisfied with. After that I post the next chapter and begin the process all over :)
Information and Statistics
| Starter | sidsel |
| Updated | Jan 26, 2012 4:33 AM |
| Replies | 3 |
| Unseen | 3 |
Navigation
Interactions
New or revised next?
Tags: advice,Book,progress,Reviews
You could also post Chapter 2, after you edited that one with all the tips you got with your reviews on Chapter 1. If you get the same tips on Chapter 2, you know you're still doing something wrong. If you get a better score, that means you have been doing something good, and you now have comments on two chapters instead of one.
For example, if you got comments on your first chapter that your dialog was kind of stiff, and you then take a look at chapter 2 and try to improve the dialog there, you can look at the reviews that you get on chapter 2 to see if you improved or not. So now you see if you've improved or not AND got reviews on not one but two chapters.
I've had my first chapter of 'The Lakar and the Quellen' reviewed (http://www.reviewfuse.com/view/10666/ for those who want to see, and thankyou to those who have reviewed it). But now what? Should I post the revised version of ch 1 first - or should I go straight to posting ch 2 instead to get the story moving? I've written 15 chapters so far.