<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critique Etiquette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewfuse.com/blog/2009/07/critique-etiquette/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewfuse.com/blog/2009/07/critique-etiquette/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie T.</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewfuse.com/blog/2009/07/critique-etiquette/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewfuse.com/blog/?p=230#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>I have belong to a critiquing group for years and joined this because with so many member in my guild, it takes a while to have a turn submitting. This is a great opportunity to get responses to short pieces of work. I want to know what's WRONG with my work before I waste time and energy fruitlessly submitting it to publishers.

However, I have noticed a pattern. If someone does not score well in the review, they tend to score the review low in return. I can see this developing into a situation where reviewers may hesitate to be honest as a result. 

As well, the reviewer should not be required to explain "why" for every comment, such as - There is no conflict threaded through the story. Are we supposed to be teaching the elements of a short story?

In addition, I have been focussing on the inline comments since the site said they were the most valuable, but submitters tend to focus on the scores.

Any tips?

Any way I/you can help the young/new writers to accept a low score without getting defensive?

Thanks.

Bonnie T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have belong to a critiquing group for years and joined this because with so many member in my guild, it takes a while to have a turn submitting. This is a great opportunity to get responses to short pieces of work. I want to know what&#8217;s WRONG with my work before I waste time and energy fruitlessly submitting it to publishers.</p>
<p>However, I have noticed a pattern. If someone does not score well in the review, they tend to score the review low in return. I can see this developing into a situation where reviewers may hesitate to be honest as a result. </p>
<p>As well, the reviewer should not be required to explain &#8220;why&#8221; for every comment, such as - There is no conflict threaded through the story. Are we supposed to be teaching the elements of a short story?</p>
<p>In addition, I have been focussing on the inline comments since the site said they were the most valuable, but submitters tend to focus on the scores.</p>
<p>Any tips?</p>
<p>Any way I/you can help the young/new writers to accept a low score without getting defensive?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Bonnie T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia H. Minor</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewfuse.com/blog/2009/07/critique-etiquette/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia H. Minor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewfuse.com/blog/?p=230#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>Well written, helpful. 
Reviewing well is an art, a skill, and a responsibility if you are going to take your time. It is tempting, as the author above refers to -to simply deliver the 'drive-by critique'. We've all received those, and hopefully we've all gotten some really thoughtful, helpful critiques that has helped our writing immensely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written, helpful.<br />
Reviewing well is an art, a skill, and a responsibility if you are going to take your time. It is tempting, as the author above refers to -to simply deliver the &#8216;drive-by critique&#8217;. We&#8217;ve all received those, and hopefully we&#8217;ve all gotten some really thoughtful, helpful critiques that has helped our writing immensely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

